Zur Navigation | Zum Inhalt
RSS/Atom - Subscribe to ryanhegs.com   Subscribe by Email     Top Blogs       Increase font 

size Decrease font 

size Reset font 

size

Update on the Members Only Board 

June 14th, 2008

The member’s only discussion board has been open for about three weeks. So far we have over 20 active members with 72 posts on 18 different subjects. If you’d like to be member on ryanhegs.com we are still accepting applicants. Our members have a wide range of experience: we have CPA’s, MBA’s, a former stockbroker, a hedge fund analyst, a stock-based compensation consultant, a few day traders, some college students, new investors and veterans with 10-20 years of experience. If you think you would be an asset to the community we’d love to have you. Eventually we will put a cap on the number of members and start kicking off the freeloaders (those not contributing insight or information). To join click the register link on the left side of the page.

Share! Bookmark this post!
Digg del.icio.us Furl StumbleUpon Slashdot Technorati YahooMyWeb Netscape Reddit NewsVine

First Bancshares (FBSI): No Reverse Split 

June 10th, 2008

Today FBSI announced that the pending reverse split was terminated. Here is some text from the filing:

On June 10, 2008, First Bancshares, Inc.’s (”Company”) Board of Directors
announced that it had terminated its plans to reduce the number of
stockholders below 300 in order to terminate the registration of the Company’s
common stock and to suspend its reporting obligations with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (”SEC”). This was to be accomplished through proposals to
amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to provide for a 1-for-500
reverse stock split, followed immediately by a 500-for-1 forward stock split,
which proposals did not receive stockholder approval at the Company’s Annual
Meeting of Stockholders held on June 10, 2008. As a result of the defeat of
these proposals by stockholders, the Company will continue its reporting
obligations as an SEC-reporting company.

Link to Form 8-K

I’m glad I wasn’t long for this one. It will be interesting to see how people’s short plays turn out.

Share! Bookmark this post!
Digg del.icio.us Furl StumbleUpon Slashdot Technorati YahooMyWeb Netscape Reddit NewsVine

FBSI Annual Meeting 

June 9th, 2008

Just a reminder that FBSI will have its annual meeting tomorrow (Tuesday) at 1:00pm Central. Tomorrow afternoon we should know whether the shareholders voted in favor of the reverse split or not. Although they may vote in favor of the split this does not make it a done deal. There are still significant financing concerns, as I (and others) have written in previous posts.

For a more detailed discussion of FBSI, register for an account so you have access to the member’s only discussion board.

Share! Bookmark this post!
Digg del.icio.us Furl StumbleUpon Slashdot Technorati YahooMyWeb Netscape Reddit NewsVine

CPTH Shares Redeemed 

May 30th, 2008

Yesterday my remaining CPTH shares were cashed-out by Scottrade. I originally posted about the Critical Path arbitrage opportunity on December 16, 2007. I purchased CPTH on December 26 for $0.076/share (purchased 13,000 shares). I was able to sell 12,500 shares on April 14, 2008 for $0.102/share. The remaining 50 shares moved in my Scottrade account on May 6 and were finally cashed-out on May 29th. I made around $350 on this transaction (about 35%).

Share! Bookmark this post!
Digg del.icio.us Furl StumbleUpon Slashdot Technorati YahooMyWeb Netscape Reddit NewsVine

FBSI Arbitrage 

May 28th, 2008

If you haven’t been paying attention to the comments, this post is for you. For the last 10 days we’ve been talking about the next potential arbitrage play in the comments (not by name until recently). For many of you this has already come across your radar. If it hasn’t, or if you are looking for more information, here are the facts on First Bancshares Inc.:

    * The company first filed documents indicating their desire to go private in late February (Schedule 13, PRE14A) at this time they were planning on a 1:1000 reverse split with fractional shares cashed out at $21.
    * According to the filings the Directors and Exec. Officers own just shy of 4% of the shares. Another 17% are held by family members. This means that they need another 30% of shareholders to vote in favor of the split - the majority of whom are likely individual investors
    * The February filings state that FSBI anticipated paying out $2.5million for the fractional shares. They estimated that outstanding shares would decrease by about 8% or 119,736 shares.
    * In April the company changed the terms to a 500:1 reverse split, fractional shares still cashed out at $21/share (SC 13E3, PRER14A)
    * At the time of these filings they anticipated paying $2.7million for fractional shares (this time based on a split half the size of the first). They indicated that they anticipate that this number will go up and cite a $5 million dividend that FBSI will be receiving as sufficient working capital to fund this transaction.
    * FBSI intends to treat beneficial holders (street name) the same as record holders, however they give repeated cautions that this is ultimately up to how your broker handles it.
    * Shareholders will vote on the transaction on June 10, 2008

So the questions are:
1. Will this get approved by shareholders? Keep in mind, only 20% of shares are held by Execs. and family. With 9.6% instutional ownership (Reuters) that leaves the decision in the hands of a lot of individual investors, who may not be crazy about cashing out the fractional shareholders, let alone holding this stock once it is de-listed.

2. Can the company afford it? $5million may not be enough to cover the number of small lots that have been purchased since the filings. The fact that the terms have been changed once already shows that FSBI probably realizes that they may have difficult funding this.

While the potential payout is sizeable (currently trading around $14), the general consensus from commenters is that it may be better to sit this one out as it is much riskier than many of the other opportunities that have come along. Before I looked into this one I foolishly purchased a handful of shares with the intention of purchasing more once I did more homework and got some feedback from a respected source. I ended up selling my shares for a minimal loss a few days later. I decided I would rather lose a little now than a lot later.

So why am I posting this? I think this is an excellent opportunity for those new to these situations to read through the filings and understand how things work. If you are new and take the time to read the filings I’ve linked above I guarantee you will learn a lot. They are pretty detailed and the April SC13 give a lot of helpful definitions (if you don’t mind sifting through a lot of financial reports). If you are new I wouldn’t recommend putting any money down on this situation. Get educated, become a member so you have access to the new discussion board, and wait for something that looks more or less like a done deal.

Kudos to Robb, Chad, Tom and others who have done a good deal of research on this arbitrage situation. Read through the comments to learn more….Chad has a different approach on this that I’m giving some thought to.

FYI - from here on out I intend to discuss the majority of these situations in the members only section. Membership is open for applicants right now (just need to register and provide a few sentences about your experience and desire to join), but I will limit the number of members down the road. I’ve got a nice discussion board setup with a few advanced features…depending on how things go I may add some additional tools in the coming months. The public blog will continue, but most of the news and conversation will hopefully take place privately. Click here to register.

Share! Bookmark this post!
Digg del.icio.us Furl StumbleUpon Slashdot Technorati YahooMyWeb Netscape Reddit NewsVine

Members Only Section Available - Apply Now! 

May 26th, 2008

I just spent the last few hours throwing together the members only section of the site. It is a work in progress, but I think everyone will be pleased. Currenty it features a discussion board for members to toss around ideas and advice. In order to become a member you will need to complete a short form asking for your name, email, username, etc. as well as give a brief explanation of your investing experience and your desire to become a member. If you have been an active member on this site please be sure to write that in one of the fields. After completing the form you will receive a confirmation email. After confirming your email I will review your appliation and (hopefully) approve you.

The purpose for the members only section is for everyone to have the opportunity to talk openly about various arbitrage opportunities (as well as other investment topics) without the potential downside of publicizing those ideas over the internet for the entire world (see “The Future of ryanhegs.com“). I want to have enough members that this section is useful and we have a good amount of conversation going, but I do plan to keep the number of members limited to a manageable size. When logged-in you will be able to see how many total members we have. Over time we will boot out the inactive members and add the promising applicants (those who have proved insightful on the public side of this blog).

I will still continue blogging publicly, but I plan for much of the preliminary discussions to take place in the members section. My blog posts will mostly be a recap of my investments (this is more for me, but if others find it helpful that is great).

Any suggestions for the site are greatly appreciated (members section or public section)!

Click here to register for the members only section of ryanhegs.com.

Share! Bookmark this post!
Digg del.icio.us Furl StumbleUpon Slashdot Technorati YahooMyWeb Netscape Reddit NewsVine

JLN Cash-out Received 

May 23rd, 2008

I lost my internet connection for a while, so I was unable to post until now. I received the JLN cash-out yesterday evening through Scottrade. Sounds like several others have as well (Bank of America). I’ve got the same question as OrenB…did anyone purchase after the meeting or after some of the paperwork was filed? If so what is your status?

Chad, I’m interested to hear how your short works out. Makes sense to me.

Share! Bookmark this post!
Digg del.icio.us Furl StumbleUpon Slashdot Technorati YahooMyWeb Netscape Reddit NewsVine

The Future of ryanhegs.com 

May 21st, 2008

Before I get into my thoughts I’d like to share the comments that prompted this post:

Arby: These deals used to work until every blogger in the world started promoting them. The death of these deals is too many people trying to game the system. By blogging about them you’re only hurting yourself.

Broken: Also, if you don’t think that you and all the other blogs that promoted this deal aren’t partly responsible for pushing up the shareholder count then you’re deluding yourself.

Skip: And Ryan, I know you enjoy posting these but I’d consider the fable of the Goose and the Golden Egg if you were smart. With all due respect, You want to make $ or have fun blogging?

Chad: Broken and (earlier post) Arby are right. Too much publicity for companies that have such a small float. If you were getting a membership fee, that would be one thing, but it sounds a lot like the early 90s when Wade Cook was promoting stock splits and everyone was rushing to the same money making idea. Stick to LBOs and MBOs and leave the small stuff alone.

Well, I thought this day might eventually come. ryanhegs.com has suddenly had a substantial increase in the number of visitors, much thanks to JLN. While most bloggers would love to see the number of readers grow, it poses some unique problems for this blog due to the nature of many of my posts.

When I started this blog I didn’t really know what direction it would head, I just thought it would be a good way for me to keep track of my investing habits and gain some accountability and advice. Over the past year arbitrage has become one of the main themes as I have done nearly a dozen reverse split plays. When I only had a few hits a day it wasn’t a big deal for me to post about these opportunities in advance as my posts would have very little influence on the transactions. Now that I’m beginning to get more traffic the concerns of Arby, Broken, Skip and Chad are worth considering. To date I know that I haven’t ruined any transactions for anyone. It wasn’t until JLN that this became a concern. As you can see from the chart below, around the time I began blogging about JLN the site visits began to take off (pretty slow until then).

Visitors to ryanhegs.com

As I mentioned in a previous comment, most of these visitors did not learn about the JLN situation from my blog, they wound up on this blog because they were searching for more information on JLN. The question now is do I continue? If so how?

To answer the question Skip posed, I certainly don’t want to undermine my own investments with my blog. On the other hand, I have found the input, feedback, and criticism from my readers helpful (which is beneficial to my investing). I don’t think that making money and blogging are mutually exclusive in this situation…I just need to determine what exactly I am going to post, when, and how…

Here’s the deal:

  • It is nice to be able to discuss these situations before they happen. It is helpful for me, and I’m guessing it is helpful (or at least interesting) for many of you.
  • It isn’t cool if we suddenly have hundreds of people making the investments mentioned on this and other sites. I’m not getting that kind of traffic yet, but it could happen and there could be consequences.
  • Here are my options as I see them:

  • Status quo – I keep on doing what I’m doing, potentially causing problems for myself, others, and even some companies in the future (if I have enough visitors following my lead). The justification here would be “the other bloggers are going to ruin it anyway, why should I be the responsible one?”
  • Hold back information – I continue to blog about my investing, but I don’t post anything until it is too late for anyone to act on it. While this keeps me from potentially spoiling any investments, it doesn’t make the site very useful for me or the readers.
  • Charge a membership fee – Chad, I like the idea…I’d love to make a buck or two doing this, but I don’t know if people would be willing to pay for the information or if they would just find it elsewhere. I’d don’t know how many paying customers I’d realistically get.
  • Create a members only section – No fees, just a section for a manageable number of members to discuss investment strategies. For example, anyone that has made a decent contribution to the conversation on this site thus far would receive a username and password. Future members would have to apply by somehow proving their worth (intellectually) to the community. I’d keep the group under a certain number and add new members only as we oust the inactive members. This members section could utilize a blog format, discussion forum, wiki’s, whatever would be the most user friendly. I’d continue to keep the current blog active for visitors, but I would only post after the fact.
  • I’d like to get the thoughts from the readers on this. I don’t necessarily have to take your advice (it is MY blog) but I am considering making changes. For now it is status quo…maybe with a bit of caution.

    I know that this blog doesn’t have the clout to make much of an impact on any arb plays (I don’t want to give myself too much credit). I think the problem isn’t with any one blog, but with the collective information floating in cyberspace from a number of different sites - plus the word-of-mouth tips as well. So, I may do my part to limit the flow of information, but at the end of the day there is still an increasing number of people getting into these arb plays. It will be interesting to see what happens with these situations in the future. It’s possible that I may start to steer away from some of these and pursue some other strategies. But for now I’m keeping my eyes out.

    Share! Bookmark this post!
    Digg del.icio.us Furl StumbleUpon Slashdot Technorati YahooMyWeb Netscape Reddit NewsVine

    JLN Again 

    May 19th, 2008

    As most of you already know, it appears that we are in the clear with JLN. It was announced today that JLN will now be listed on OTC.. It will be some time, but the money will be coming.

    Before that news was announced I was going to point to the May 15th 10-Q to support the idea that this was still going to happen. The company specifically addressed the concerns that transaction would cost more than $3,000,000:

    In the event that the total cost of repurchases of shares of common stock in the deregistration transaction exceeds $3,000,000, the Company has been advised by its bank lender that it intends to work with us to enter into a mutually agreeable amendment to the bank credit facility so that the Company may complete the deregistration transaction. The Company anticipates that any borrowings under the bank credit facility to repurchase shares in the deregistration transaction will be repaid in the ordinary course of business.

    This post is by no means an I-told-you-so…there were certaintly some legitimate concerns. As I’ve always stated, these are not risk-free investments and should not be done with money you can’t afford to lose. I appreciate those who voiced their opinions on both sides of this situation.

    I also appreciate the concerns voiced about this blog in general (ruining profit opportuniteis by publicizing arbitrage opportunities). I plan to address these concerns in my next post.

    Share! Bookmark this post!
    Digg del.icio.us Furl StumbleUpon Slashdot Technorati YahooMyWeb Netscape Reddit NewsVine

    Arbitrage Progress Report 

    May 18th, 2008

    Today I decided to go through my arbitrage investments see exactly how I have done. In the last two years I have done 11 arbitrage plays. Of these 11 plays two did not work out (one of these two would have if I held onto the shares) and two are still in progress (one an anticipated loss, one an anticipated gain). Here are the stats:

      The average return was 14%
      The average number of days to receive cash was 55 (for the 7 successful plays to date)
      The average annualized return for all investments was 76%

    Note:
    1. Statistics include commissions, fees, and money lost on unsuccessful transactions.
    2. Statistics assume that the JLN opportunity will be completed as planned.
    3. Statistics include the loss on CZBC if I were to sell the shares tomorrow.

    PS - I have another arbitrage play I will be reporting on soon. Before I post it I want to check with a source or two and speak with my broker. If it is worthwhile (and I think it is) it will probably be posted by Tuesday night.

    Share! Bookmark this post!
    Digg del.icio.us Furl StumbleUpon Slashdot Technorati YahooMyWeb Netscape Reddit NewsVine



    None of the information contained on "ryanhegs.com" constitutes a recommendation by RyanHegs or ryanhegs.com that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction, or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. You must make your own independent decisions regarding any security, portfolio of securities, transaction, or investment strategy mentioned on this website. RyanHegs's past results are not necessarily indicative of future performance. Neither Ryan, nor ryanhegs.com guarantees any specific outcome or profit, and you should be aware of the real risk of loss in following any strategy or investments discussed on this site. The strategy or investments discussed may fluctuate in price or value and you may get back less than you invested. Before acting on any information on this site, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and strongly consider seeking advice from your own financial or investment adviser.